Lemishow v. Previte

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lemishow v. Previte

51 A.D.2d 1049, 381 N.Y.S.2d 336, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11866

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 22, 1976

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 51 A.D.2d 1049 (Lemishow v. Previte) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lemishow v. Previte, 51 A.D.2d 1049, 381 N.Y.S.2d 336, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11866 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding to invalidate petitions designating respondents Ben Lieblein and others as candidates in the Republican Party Primary Election to be held on April 6, 1976 for the party positions of State committeeman (male) and State committeeman (female) and county committeemen in the 28th Assembly District, Queens County, the appeal is from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated Harch 15, 1976, as denied the application, except with regard to the positions of county committeemen in the 51st, 82nd, 5th and 24th Election Districts, respectively. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. In the absence of the submission of a copy of the transcript of the trial, we would not be warranted in disturbing the findings of Special Term. Hartuscello, Acting P. J., Latham, Cohalan and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to invalidate petitions designating respondents Ben Lieblein and others as candidates in the Republican Party Primary Election to be held on April 6, 1976 for the party positions of State committeeman (male) and State committeeman (female) and county committeemen in the 28th Assembly District, Queens County, the appeal is from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated Harch 15, 1976, as denied the application, except with regard to the positions of county committeemen in the 51st, 82nd, 5th and 24th Election Districts, respectively. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. In the absence of the submission of a copy of the transcript of the trial, we would not be warranted in disturbing the findings of Special Term. Hartuscello, Acting P. J., Latham, Cohalan and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 A.D.2d 1049, 381 N.Y.S.2d 336, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11866, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lemishow-v-previte-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack