Lembo Mayflower Creamery Co. v. Martin

1 Mass. App. Dec. 165
Boston Municipal Court·Decided December 9, 1941·No. Nos. 150469, 150470·Published

Opinion

BY THE COURT

(Putnam, J., Riley, J. & Tomasello, J.)

—These cases arose out of an ordinary collision of two motor vehicles at the intersection of two streets, and they fall within the general rule that when a collision occurs at intersecting streets the issues of due care and negligence of the respective drivers of the automobiles present questions of fact. Walsh v. Wilson, 281 Mass. 78.

The judge specifically found that both drivers were negligent and found for the defendant in each case. There is no incon[166]*166sistency in those findings and the requests presented by the plaintiff and granted by the court, and the denial of certain other requests presented by the defendant was, under the circumstances, correct.

Report dismissed with double costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lembo Mayflower Creamery Co. v. Martin, 1 Mass. App. Dec. 165 (Mass. Super. Ct. 1941).

1 Mass. App. Dec. 165 (Lembo Mayflower Creamery Co. v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walsh v. Wilson
183 N.E. 261 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1932)