Lemarr v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Lemarr v. State

2006 WY 78, 139 P.3d 435, 2006 Wyo. LEXIS 84

CourtWyoming Supreme Court

DecidedJune 29, 2006

DocketNo. 05-264

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 2006 WY 78 (Lemarr v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wyoming Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lemarr v. State, 2006 WY 78, 139 P.3d 435, 2006 Wyo. LEXIS 84 (Wyo. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

Order Affirming the Judgment and SENTENCE OF THE DISTRICT COURT

This matter came before the Court upon its own motion following receipt of appellant’s pro se brief which was filed with the Court on May 18, 2006. On April 26, 2006, appellant’s court-appointed appellate counsel filed a “Motion to Withdraw” as counsel, pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 1400, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Following a careful review of the record and the “Anders brief’ submitted by counsel, this Court entered its “Order Granting Permission for Court Appointed Counsel to Withdraw and Conditionally Affirming Judgment and Sentence,” on May 9, 2006. That Order provided that the District Court’s October 11, 2005, “Sentence” would be summarily affirmed unless the appellant, Faith Ann LeMarr, on or before June 23, 2006, raised points of her choosing that convinced this Court that the captioned appeal is less than wholly frivolous. Taking notice that the appellant, Faith Ann LeMarr, has failed to raise any meritorious issue in her pro se brief, the Court finds that the judgment and sentence in this matter should be affirmed. It is, therefore,

ORDERED that the District Court’s October 11, 2005, “Sentence” be, and the same hereby is, affirmed.

BY THE COURT

/s/William U. Hill WILLIAM U. HILL Chief Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order Affirming the Judgment and SENTENCE OF THE DISTRICT COURT

This matter came before the Court upon its own motion following receipt of appellant’s pro se brief which was filed with the Court on May 18, 2006. On April 26, 2006, appellant’s court-appointed appellate counsel filed a “Motion to Withdraw” as counsel, pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 1400, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Following a careful review of the record and the “Anders brief’ submitted by counsel, this Court entered its “Order Granting Permission for Court Appointed Counsel to Withdraw and Conditionally Affirming Judgment and Sentence,” on May 9, 2006. That Order provided that the District Court’s October 11, 2005, “Sentence” would be summarily affirmed unless the appellant, Faith Ann LeMarr, on or before June 23, 2006, raised points of her choosing that convinced this Court that the captioned appeal is less than wholly frivolous. Taking notice that the appellant, Faith Ann LeMarr, has failed to raise any meritorious issue in her pro se brief, the Court finds that the judgment and sentence in this matter should be affirmed. It is, therefore,

ORDERED that the District Court’s October 11, 2005, “Sentence” be, and the same hereby is, affirmed.

BY THE COURT

/s/William U. Hill WILLIAM U. HILL Chief Justice

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2006 WY 78, 139 P.3d 435, 2006 Wyo. LEXIS 84, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lemarr-v-state-wyo-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack