Lemann v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Lemann v. United States

57 Cust. Ct. 361, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1720

United States Customs Court·Decided November 14, 1966·No. C.D. 2820·Published

Opinion

Nichols, Judge:

When this case was called for trial, there was no appearance on the part of the plaintiff, and counsel for the Government [362]*362moved to dismiss the protest for lack of jurisdiction on the ground that the protest claimed that the appraised value was incorrect and, therefore, did not properly invoke the jurisdiction of the court.

Upon examination of the protest, the motion is granted and the protest is dismissed. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nichols, Judge:

When this case was called for trial, there was no appearance on the part of the plaintiff, and counsel for the Government [362]*362moved to dismiss the protest for lack of jurisdiction on the ground that the protest claimed that the appraised value was incorrect and, therefore, did not properly invoke the jurisdiction of the court.

Upon examination of the protest, the motion is granted and the protest is dismissed. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Lemann v. United States, 57 Cust. Ct. 361, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1720 (cusc 1966).

Pincite

57 Cust. Ct. 361 (Lemann v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.