Lema Realty Corp. v. Najarian

186 Misc. 752, 65 N.Y.S.2d 323, 1946 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2810
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided April 11, 1946·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Memorandum Per Curiam.

Plaintiff was entitled to relet the premises for the account of the tenant upon the latter’s abandonment thereof, pursuant to the provisions of the lease between them. But it was not authorized to grant the new tenants any concession at the expense of the abandoning tenant (Schwartz v. Brucato, 57 App. Div. 202). Accordingly, it was not entitled to rent for January and February, 1944, the period of the concession.

The judgment should be unanimously modified upon the law by reducing the amount of the recovery against defendant to $210, together with interest and appropriate costs in the court below, and as so modified affirmed, with $25 costs of this appeal to the defendant.

MacCrate, McCooey and Steinbrink, JJ., concur.

Judgment accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lema Realty Corp. v. Najarian, 186 Misc. 752, 65 N.Y.S.2d 323, 1946 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2810 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1946).

186 Misc. 752 (Lema Realty Corp. v. Najarian) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Millison v. Clarke
413 A.2d 198 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1980)