L.E.M. v. State

719 So. 2d 381, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13426, 1998 WL 765019
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 21, 1998·No. No. 98-956·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Given the totality of the circumstances, we conclude that the school official had reasonable suspicion to conduct a search of the appellant juvenile. See New Jersey v. T.L.O., 469 U.S. 325, 341-43, 105 S.Ct. 733, 83 L.Ed.2d 720 (1985); A.S. v. State, 693 So.2d 1095, 1095 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997); State v. D.T.W., 425 So.2d 1383, 1386-87 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). We therefore, find no error in the trial court’s denial of the appellant’s motion to suppress.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

L.E.M. v. State, 719 So. 2d 381, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13426, 1998 WL 765019 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

719 So. 2d 381 (L.E.M. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

New Jersey v. T. L. O.
469 U.S. 325 (Supreme Court, 1985)
State v. D.T.W.
425 So. 2d 1383 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
A.S. v. State
693 So. 2d 1095 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)