L.E.M. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

L.E.M. v. State

719 So. 2d 381, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13426, 1998 WL 765019

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 21, 1998

DocketNo. 98-956

StatusPublished

This text of 719 So. 2d 381 (L.E.M. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

L.E.M. v. State, 719 So. 2d 381, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13426, 1998 WL 765019 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Given the totality of the circumstances, we conclude that the school official had reasonable suspicion to conduct a search of the appellant juvenile. See New Jersey v. T.L.O., 469 U.S. 325, 341-43, 105 S.Ct. 733, 83 L.Ed.2d 720 (1985); A.S. v. State, 693 So.2d 1095, 1095 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997); State v. D.T.W., 425 So.2d 1383, 1386-87 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). We therefore, find no error in the trial court’s denial of the appellant’s motion to suppress.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Given the totality of the circumstances, we conclude that the school official had reasonable suspicion to conduct a search of the appellant juvenile. See New Jersey v. T.L.O., 469 U.S. 325, 341-43, 105 S.Ct. 733, 83 L.Ed.2d 720 (1985); A.S. v. State, 693 So.2d 1095, 1095 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997); State v. D.T.W., 425 So.2d 1383, 1386-87 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). We therefore, find no error in the trial court’s denial of the appellant’s motion to suppress.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

719 So. 2d 381, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13426, 1998 WL 765019, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lem-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack