Lelis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Lelis v. State

186 So. 2d 811, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5405

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 26, 1966

DocketNo. 65-658

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 186 So. 2d 811 (Lelis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lelis v. State, 186 So. 2d 811, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5405 (Fla. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was informed against for the crime of assault with intent to commit rape; tried by jury; found guilty; and sentenced to two years in the State Penitentiary.

The appellant urges error in the failure of the trial court to direct a verdict in his favor at the close of all the evidence, and in the giving or failing to give certain jury instructions. We find no error and affirm. See: Autrey v. State, 94 Fla. 229, 114 So. 244; Albano v. State, Fla.1956, 89 So.2d 342; Jackson v. State, Fla.App.1958, 107 So.2d 247; Hodges v. State, Fla.App. 1958, 107 So.2d 794, 69 A.L.R.2d 1091; Hamilton v. State, Fla.App.1963,152 So.2d 793; Phillips v. State, Fla.App.1965, 177 So.2d 243.

Therefore, the verdict, adjudication and sentence here under review is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was informed against for the crime of assault with intent to commit rape; tried by jury; found guilty; and sentenced to two years in the State Penitentiary.

The appellant urges error in the failure of the trial court to direct a verdict in his favor at the close of all the evidence, and in the giving or failing to give certain jury instructions. We find no error and affirm. See: Autrey v. State, 94 Fla. 229, 114 So. 244; Albano v. State, Fla.1956, 89 So.2d 342; Jackson v. State, Fla.App.1958, 107 So.2d 247; Hodges v. State, Fla.App. 1958, 107 So.2d 794, 69 A.L.R.2d 1091; Hamilton v. State, Fla.App.1963,152 So.2d 793; Phillips v. State, Fla.App.1965, 177 So.2d 243.

Therefore, the verdict, adjudication and sentence here under review is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

186 So. 2d 811, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5405, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lelis-v-state-fladistctapp-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack