Leland W. Jacobs v. Gear Properties

2 F. App'x 617
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 2, 2001
Docket00-1257MN
StatusUnpublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 2 F. App'x 617 (Leland W. Jacobs v. Gear Properties) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Leland W. Jacobs v. Gear Properties, 2 F. App'x 617 (8th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Leland W. Jacobs appeals the District Court’s 1 dismissal of his civil rights action, in which he claimed that defendants evicted him from his apartment for a discriminatory or retaliatory reason. Plaintiffs eviction occurred after defendants prevailed in their state court unlawful detain-er action against him. 2 After de novo review, see Lemonds v. St. Louis County, 222 F.3d 488, 492 (8th Cir.2000), we conclude the District Court properly dismissed plaintiffs action, as it lacked subject matter jurisdiction under the Rooker- Feldman 3 doctrine. See Charchenko v. City of Stillwater, 47 F.3d 981, 983 (8th Cir.1995) (Rooker-Feldman precludes federal claims if relief requested would effectively reverse state court decision or void its ruling).

*618 Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.

2

. Gear Props. v. Jacobs, No. C1-97-2266, 1998 WL 550762 (Minn.Ct.App. Sept.l, 1998) (unpublished decision).

3

. Rooker v. Fid. Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413, 44 S.Ct. 149, 68 L.Ed. 362 (1923); Dist. of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 103 S.Ct. 1303, 75 L.Ed.2d 206 (1983).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 F. App'x 617, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leland-w-jacobs-v-gear-properties-ca8-2001.