Leland v. Rose
10 La. Ann. 415
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Leland v. Rose. Read the opinion of the Court — 11 La. Ann. 69 →
Opinion
This application for mandamus cannot be entertained, the petition not being sworn to, as required by Article 840 of the Code of Practice.
We may remark further, that were the petition sworn to, it presents no cause for a mandamus. The proper remedy would be an appeal from the judgment complained of.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Leland v. Rose, 10 La. Ann. 415 (La. 1855).
10 La. Ann. 415 (Leland v. Rose) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.