Leland v. Rose

10 La. Ann. 415
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedJune 15, 1855
StatusPublished

This text of 10 La. Ann. 415 (Leland v. Rose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Leland v. Rose, 10 La. Ann. 415 (La. 1855).

Opinion

Buchanan, J.

This application for mandamus cannot be entertained, the petition not being sworn to, as required by Article 840 of the Code of Practice.

We may remark further, that were the petition sworn to, it presents no cause for a mandamus. The proper remedy would be an appeal from the judgment complained of.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 La. Ann. 415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leland-v-rose-la-1855.