Leland v. Rockwell

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Leland v. Rockwell

920 So. 2d 167, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 1416, 2006 WL 264072

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 6, 2006

DocketNo. 1D05-4225

StatusPublished

This text of 920 So. 2d 167 (Leland v. Rockwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leland v. Rockwell, 920 So. 2d 167, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 1416, 2006 WL 264072 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the appellants’ response to this Court’s order dated December 8, 2005, the notice of appeal is hereby treated as seeking certiorari review of the opinion of the Circuit Court in and for Santa Rosa County, Florida, entered on June 16, 2005, which affirmed Final Judgment entered January 27, 2004. See Fla. R. pp. P. 9.030(b)(2)(B). The petition is DISMISSED. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.330(b); Johnson v. Florida Dept. of Law Enforcement, 881 So.2d 64 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); DeBiasi v. Snaith, 732 So.2d 14, 17 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). Compare Dade Federal Sav. & Loan Ass’n v. Smith, 403 So.2d 995 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981) (treating order on first motion for rehearing that changed the entire basis for the ruling of the first opinion as a new opinion toward which a new motion for rehearing was authorized).

All pending motions are denied as moot.

WEBSTER, POLSTON and HAWKES, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the appellants’ response to this Court’s order dated December 8, 2005, the notice of appeal is hereby treated as seeking certiorari review of the opinion of the Circuit Court in and for Santa Rosa County, Florida, entered on June 16, 2005, which affirmed Final Judgment entered January 27, 2004. See Fla. R. pp. P. 9.030(b)(2)(B). The petition is DISMISSED. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.330(b); Johnson v. Florida Dept. of Law Enforcement, 881 So.2d 64 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); DeBiasi v. Snaith, 732 So.2d 14, 17 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). Compare Dade Federal Sav. & Loan Ass’n v. Smith, 403 So.2d 995 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981) (treating order on first motion for rehearing that changed the entire basis for the ruling of the first opinion as a new opinion toward which a new motion for rehearing was authorized).

All pending motions are denied as moot.

WEBSTER, POLSTON and HAWKES, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

920 So. 2d 167, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 1416, 2006 WL 264072, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leland-v-rockwell-fladistctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack