Leland v. Newton

102 Mass. 350
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided October 15, 1869·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Chapman, C. J.

The principles to be applied to this case are plain. When pne of two copartners dies, the survivor should settle the estate, and account to the personal representative of the deceased. Washburn v. Goodman, 17 Pick. 519. But if the survivor himself becomes the personal representative of the deceased, he becomes bound, as executor or administrator, to render an account of his proceedings to the judge of probate. That account necessarily involves the settlement of the partnership affairs. There is no need of any other legal process, because all persons interested in the estate have an opportunity to be heard in respect to the settlement. Forward v. Forward, 6 Allen, 494. He has no right to have his account allowed without such hearing. Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leland v. Newton, 102 Mass. 350 (Mass. 1869).

102 Mass. 350 (Leland v. Newton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mitchell's Estate
33 Pa. D. & C. 715 (Philadelphia County Orphans' Court, 1938)
Malden Trust Co. v. Brooks
291 Mass. 273 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1935)
In Re the Estate of Chuck
33 Haw. 445 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1935)
Moore v. Fidelity Trust Co.
138 F. 1 (Third Circuit, 1905)
Moore v. Fidelity Trust Co.
134 F. 489 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania, 1905)