Leland v. Newton

102 Mass. 350
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1869
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 102 Mass. 350 (Leland v. Newton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Leland v. Newton, 102 Mass. 350 (Mass. 1869).

Opinion

Chapman, C. J.

The principles to be applied to this case are plain. When pne of two copartners dies, the survivor should settle the estate, and account to the personal representative of the deceased. Washburn v. Goodman, 17 Pick. 519. But if the survivor himself becomes the personal representative of the deceased, he becomes bound, as executor or administrator, to render an account of his proceedings to the judge of probate. That account necessarily involves the settlement of the partnership affairs. There is no need of any other legal process, because all persons interested in the estate have an opportunity to be heard in respect to the settlement. Forward v. Forward, 6 Allen, 494. He has no right to have his account allowed without such hearing. Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mitchell's Estate
33 Pa. D. & C. 715 (Philadelphia County Orphans' Court, 1938)
Malden Trust Co. v. Brooks
291 Mass. 273 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1935)
In Re the Estate of Chuck
33 Haw. 445 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1935)
Moore v. Fidelity Trust Co.
138 F. 1 (Third Circuit, 1905)
Moore v. Fidelity Trust Co.
134 F. 489 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
102 Mass. 350, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leland-v-newton-mass-1869.