Leland Inmon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Leland Inmon v. State

190 So. 3d 693, 2016 WL 2760018, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 7301

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 13, 2016

Docket5D15-1076

StatusPublished

This text of 190 So. 3d 693 (Leland Inmon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leland Inmon v. State, 190 So. 3d 693, 2016 WL 2760018, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 7301 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals the trial court’s summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for postconviction relief.-. Appellant asserts-seven claims for relief. .Finding merit with regard to only claim two, we reverse the denial as to that claim and remand for the trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing regarding Appellant’s trial counsel’s failure' to present evidence relevant to Appellant’s history of substance abuse, which would *694 qualify him for sentencing pursuant to section 948.20, Florida Statutes (2013). We affirm the trial court’s summary denial, of the remaining six claims.

AFFIRMED in PART; REVERSED in PART; REMANDED with Instructions.

. ORFINGER, EVANDER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals the trial court’s summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for postconviction relief.-. Appellant asserts-seven claims for relief. .Finding merit with regard to only claim two, we reverse the denial as to that claim and remand for the trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing regarding Appellant’s trial counsel’s failure' to present evidence relevant to Appellant’s history of substance abuse, which would *694 qualify him for sentencing pursuant to section 948.20, Florida Statutes (2013). We affirm the trial court’s summary denial, of the remaining six claims.

AFFIRMED in PART; REVERSED in PART; REMANDED with Instructions.

. ORFINGER, EVANDER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

190 So. 3d 693, 2016 WL 2760018, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 7301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leland-inmon-v-state-fladistctapp-2016.