Lela Wilcox v. Tighe E. Woods, Housing Expediter, Office of the Housing Expediter
181 F.2d 1012
Opinion
A careful consideration of the briefs, the record and the qral argument convinces ,us that the learned trial judge committed no error in this proceeding which would require a reversal of the judgment below. No new point of law is presented which should be discussed here. See Porter v. Warner Holding Co., 328 U.S. 395, 66 S.Ct. 1086, 90 L.Ed. 1332; Woods v. Richman, 9 Cir., 174 F.2d 614, and Brooks v. Woods, 9 Cir., 181 F.2d 716. The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lela Wilcox v. Tighe E. Woods, Housing Expediter, Office of the Housing Expediter, 181 F.2d 1012 (9th Cir. 1950).
181 F.2d 1012 (Lela Wilcox v. Tighe E. Woods, Housing Expediter, Office of the Housing Expediter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Porter v. Warner Holding Co.
328 U.S. 395 (Supreme Court, 1946)
Brooks v. Woods, Housing Expediter
181 F.2d 716 (Ninth Circuit, 1950)
Woods v. Richman
174 F.2d 614 (Ninth Circuit, 1949)