Lela Avant v. Banking Commissioner
This text of 278 S.W. 1101 (Lela Avant v. Banking Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The deposit in this case in its inception was an interest-bearing deposit, and while by the expiration of time it may have ceased to bear interest for' such additional time as the money was left in the bank, yet the interest agreed upon for the specified time was compensation for such time as the money was left in the bank under the contract. The character of- the contract was never changed. The'certificate was not subsequent to the time it ceased to bear interest presented to the bank and a new deposit contract created. It is clear therefore that the deposit was not a noninterest-bear-ing deposit. The writ of error is accordingly refused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
278 S.W. 1101, 115 Tex. 167, 1926 Tex. LEXIS 124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lela-avant-v-banking-commissioner-tex-1926.