Lekutanovic v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lekutanovic v. City of New York

279 A.D.2d 378, 719 N.Y.S.2d 556, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 658

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 23, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 279 A.D.2d 378 (Lekutanovic v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lekutanovic v. City of New York, 279 A.D.2d 378, 719 N.Y.S.2d 556, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 658 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Stanley Green, J.), entered [379]*379July 14, 1999, which denied plaintiffs’ motion to strike the municipal defendant’s answer and granted that defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the cross motion denied, and the motion granted unless said defendant complies with plaintiffs’ discovery demand within 30 days of service of a copy of this order with notice of entry.

There was no justification for granting summary judgment to the municipal defendant before it had complied with plaintiffs’ discovery demands. Those demands were reasonable and met with no objection. The motion to strike was made fully a year after the City had initially agreed to produce its records. Those records might or might not reveal a hazard at the location of the accident, which could raise a question as to the necessity of a more appropriate safety design. In light of the incomplete state of the record, summary judgment was premature (Johnson v Fuller Co., 235 AD2d 348). Concur— Rosenberger, J. P., Tom, Wallach, Rubin and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Stanley Green, J.), entered [379]*379July 14, 1999, which denied plaintiffs’ motion to strike the municipal defendant’s answer and granted that defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the cross motion denied, and the motion granted unless said defendant complies with plaintiffs’ discovery demand within 30 days of service of a copy of this order with notice of entry.

There was no justification for granting summary judgment to the municipal defendant before it had complied with plaintiffs’ discovery demands. Those demands were reasonable and met with no objection. The motion to strike was made fully a year after the City had initially agreed to produce its records. Those records might or might not reveal a hazard at the location of the accident, which could raise a question as to the necessity of a more appropriate safety design. In light of the incomplete state of the record, summary judgment was premature (Johnson v Fuller Co., 235 AD2d 348). Concur— Rosenberger, J. P., Tom, Wallach, Rubin and Saxe, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

279 A.D.2d 378, 719 N.Y.S.2d 556, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 658, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lekutanovic-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack