Lekaj v. Don-Jo Livery Inc.

180 A.D.2d 545

This text of 180 A.D.2d 545 (Lekaj v. Don-Jo Livery Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lekaj v. Don-Jo Livery Inc., 180 A.D.2d 545 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

Orders, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Herbert Shapiro, J.), entered April 9, 1991, which granted the motions of defendants Naclerio Construction and Don-Jo Livery to sever plaintiffs’ action against them from plaintiffs’ action against defendant City of New York to the extent of bifurcating the trial as to liability and damages, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The prior order, which struck defendant City’s answer for failure to comply with discovery, and from which no appeal was taken, may not be reinterpreted at this juncture as striking only the City’s reply to defendant Naclerio’s cross-claim. Contrary to the City’s arguments, the discovery it failed to provide affected the claims of the plaintiffs and all of the remaining defendants. Thus, the sanction imposed, that of striking the answer, was not on its face so unwarranted as to suggest that the prior Justice could not have intended that result. Furthermore, under the circumstances presented, it was sufficient that the non-moving parties "joined” in defendant Naclerio’s request for relief. We have examined the remaining contentions of the parties and find them to be without merit. Concur — Carro, J. P., Milonas, Ellerin and Ross, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
180 A.D.2d 545, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lekaj-v-don-jo-livery-inc-nyappdiv-1992.