L.E.J. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

L.E.J. v. State

712 So. 2d 478, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8100, 1998 WL 374913

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 8, 1998

DocketNo. 98-957

StatusPublished

This text of 712 So. 2d 478 (L.E.J. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

L.E.J. v. State, 712 So. 2d 478, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8100, 1998 WL 374913 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The State properly concedes that the trial court erred in finding that the appellant, who was the respondent below, was delinquent for having committed the offense of “Resisting Arrest with Violence” as a lesser included offense of the original charge of “Battery on a Police Officer,” as set forth in count one of the information.

Accordingly, the trial court’s findings as to count one of the information must be reversed.

The trial court’s findings in count two of the information are unaffected by this holding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The State properly concedes that the trial court erred in finding that the appellant, who was the respondent below, was delinquent for having committed the offense of “Resisting Arrest with Violence” as a lesser included offense of the original charge of “Battery on a Police Officer,” as set forth in count one of the information.

Accordingly, the trial court’s findings as to count one of the information must be reversed.

The trial court’s findings in count two of the information are unaffected by this holding.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

712 So. 2d 478, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8100, 1998 WL 374913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lej-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.