Home/Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York/Leith v. Reese

Leith v. Reese

84 N.Y.S. 1133
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedNovember 6, 1903
StatusPublished

This text of 84 N.Y.S. 1133 (Leith v. Reese) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Leith v. Reese, 84 N.Y.S. 1133 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1903).

Opinion

BLANCHARD, J.

The complaint fails, in that it does not allege that the defendants procured the sale of the property. The complaint alleges that the American Bridge Company obtained a judgment, and that the defendants-claimed to be the assignees; but at whose instance, although a sale of the property was-had, the complaint is silent. The judgment must be affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
84 N.Y.S. 1133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leith-v-reese-nyappterm-1903.