Leiter v. Green
13 Misc. 2d 449, 179 N.Y.S.2d 753
Opinion
In view of the retention of the bill of particulars for more than a month after its service and the continuance of settlement negotiations in the meantime, the denial of the motion to relieve the plaintiff of the consequences of the preclusion order was an improvident exercise of discretion.
The order should be reversed, without costs, and motion granted.
Concur — Steuer, J. P., Hofstadter and Aurelio, JJ.
Order reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Leiter v. Green, 13 Misc. 2d 449, 179 N.Y.S.2d 753 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).
13 Misc. 2d 449 (Leiter v. Green) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Noftell v. Gair Realty Corp.
32 A.D.2d 839 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1969)