Leitch v. the Druid Hill Lake Apartments Company

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Leitch v. the Druid Hill Lake Apartments Company

120 A. 372, 142 Md. 192, 1923 Md. LEXIS 14

DecidedJanuary 9, 1923

StatusPublished

This text of 120 A. 372 (Leitch v. the Druid Hill Lake Apartments Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leitch v. the Druid Hill Lake Apartments Company, 120 A. 372, 142 Md. 192, 1923 Md. LEXIS 14 (Md. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Thomas, J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

In this case the appeal is by the receivers for the Druid Hill Lake Apartment Company from the order and decree of the Circuit Court of Baltimore City restraining them from causing execution to issue on certain judgments recovered by them against stockholders of said company, including the judgment affirmed by this Court in No. 57 Appeals of the October Term {ante, p. 184). The grounds upon which the relief mentioned was sought by the petitioners, appellees, in this case are practically the same grounds upon which the appellant (one of the appellees in this case) insisted upon a reversal of the judgment in No. 57, and as the questions raised in this appeal were considered and disposed of in No. 57, we must, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in that case, reverse the decree from which this appeal was taken.

Decree reversed with costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomas, J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

In this case the appeal is by the receivers for the Druid Hill Lake Apartment Company from the order and decree of the Circuit Court of Baltimore City restraining them from causing execution to issue on certain judgments recovered by them against stockholders of said company, including the judgment affirmed by this Court in No. 57 Appeals of the October Term {ante, p. 184). The grounds upon which the relief mentioned was sought by the petitioners, appellees, in this case are practically the same grounds upon which the appellant (one of the appellees in this case) insisted upon a reversal of the judgment in No. 57, and as the questions raised in this appeal were considered and disposed of in No. 57, we must, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in that case, reverse the decree from which this appeal was taken.

Decree reversed with costs, and petition dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

120 A. 372, 142 Md. 192, 1923 Md. LEXIS 14, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leitch-v-the-druid-hill-lake-apartments-company-md-1923.