Leisure v. Coleco Industries

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Leisure v. Coleco Industries

390 So. 2d 1229, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18189

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 9, 1980

DocketNos. 79-841, 79-1175 and 79-1206

StatusPublished

This text of 390 So. 2d 1229 (Leisure v. Coleco Industries) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leisure v. Coleco Industries, 390 So. 2d 1229, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18189 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The trial court properly refused appellant’s requested strict liability instruction. See Skaggs v. Clairol, Inc., 6 Cal.App.3d 1, 85 Cal.Rptr. 584 (Ct.App.1970). In so ruling, we reject appellant’s claim that appel-lee’s sale of the pool and slide as a unit constituted sale of a “product in a defective condition unreasonably dangerous to the user... . ”

The remarks made by counsel and the bench, if error, were harmless.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The trial court properly refused appellant’s requested strict liability instruction. See Skaggs v. Clairol, Inc., 6 Cal.App.3d 1, 85 Cal.Rptr. 584 (Ct.App.1970). In so ruling, we reject appellant’s claim that appel-lee’s sale of the pool and slide as a unit constituted sale of a “product in a defective condition unreasonably dangerous to the user... . ”

The remarks made by counsel and the bench, if error, were harmless.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

390 So. 2d 1229, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leisure-v-coleco-industries-fladistctapp-1980.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack