Leisure v. Coleco Industries
390 So. 2d 1229, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18189
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 9, 1980·No. Nos. 79-841, 79-1175 and 79-1206·Published
Opinions
The trial court properly refused appellant’s requested strict liability instruction. See Skaggs v. Clairol, Inc., 6 Cal.App.3d 1, 85 Cal.Rptr. 584 (Ct.App.1970). In so ruling, we reject appellant’s claim that appel-lee’s sale of the pool and slide as a unit constituted sale of a “product in a defective condition unreasonably dangerous to the user... . ”
The remarks made by counsel and the bench, if error, were harmless.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Leisure v. Coleco Industries, 390 So. 2d 1229, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18189 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).
390 So. 2d 1229 (Leisure v. Coleco Industries) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sansing v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
354 So. 2d 895 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)