Leisure Time Ent. v. Cal Vista
41 F. App'x 925
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 17, 2002·No. No. 00-57005; D.C. No. CV-94-2873-MRP(JGx)·Published
Opinion
ORDER
By way of clarification, the memorandum disposition filed in this case on May 21, 2002 does not preclude the retrial and recalculation of damages. Nor is the memorandum disposition meant to provide a detailed road map for the district court on retrial. It is left to the district court’s judgment as to how best to develop a new evidentiary record that will support a damages award, whether that be through declarations, testimony, or other appropriate means.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Leisure Time Ent. v. Cal Vista, 41 F. App'x 925 (9th Cir. 2002).
41 F. App'x 925 (Leisure Time Ent. v. Cal Vista) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.