Leiser v. State

398 So. 2d 889, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19673
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 30, 1981·No. No. WW-170·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order denying appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.850 is affirmed. However, the case is remanded for correction of the judgment and sentence to reflect the specific crime for which appellant was convicted. Williams v. State, 360 So.2d 61 (Fla.2d DCA 1978); Griffen v. State, 384 So.2d 324 (Fla.2d DCA 1980). Appellant need not be present for this purpose.

McCORD, ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr. and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leiser v. State, 398 So. 2d 889, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19673 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

398 So. 2d 889 (Leiser v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Tamarac v. Garchar
398 So. 2d 889 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)