Leinyuy Robert Yangeh v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 21, 2016
Docket01-15-01051-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Leinyuy Robert Yangeh v. State (Leinyuy Robert Yangeh v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Leinyuy Robert Yangeh v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

Opinion issued January 21, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-15-01051-CR NO. 01-15-01052-CR ——————————— LEINYUY ROBERT YANGEH, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 176th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case Nos. 1473903 & 1473904

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Leinyuy Robert Yangeh, pled guilty to the felony offense of

possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance. The trial court found

appellant guilty and, in accordance with the terms of appellant’s plea bargain agreement with the State, sentenced appellant to 7 years’ incarceration in the

Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant filed

a pro se notice of appeal.

In a plea bargain case, a defendant may only appeal those matters that were

raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial or after getting the trial

court’s permission to appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). An appeal must be

dismissed if a certification showing that the defendant has the right of appeal has

not been made part of the record. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).

Here, the trial court’s certification is included in the record on appeal. See id.

The trial court’s certification states that this is a plea bargain case and that the

defendant has no right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The record

supports the trial court’s certification. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615

(Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Because appellant has no right of appeal, we must

dismiss this appeal. See Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App.

2006) (“A court of appeals, while having jurisdiction to ascertain whether an

appellant who plea-bargained is permitted to appeal by Rule 25.2(a)(2), must

dismiss a prohibited appeal without further action, regardless of the basis for the

appeal.”).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. We dismiss any

pending motions as moot.

2 PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Massengale and Brown.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dears v. State
154 S.W.3d 610 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005)
Chavez v. State
183 S.W.3d 675 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Leinyuy Robert Yangeh v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leinyuy-robert-yangeh-v-state-texapp-2016.