Leininger v. Summit Branch Railroad
36 A. 738, 180 Pa. 287, 1897 Pa. LEXIS 919
Opinion
There is no error in this-decree. We fully agree with the learned master in his third finding: “ That the plaintiffs’ bill is an ejectment bill.” That alone was sufficient to justifjr the action of the court below in dismissing the bill, and the decree -should not be disturbed.
Decree affirmed, and appeal dismissed'at plaintiffs’ costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Leininger v. Summit Branch Railroad, 36 A. 738, 180 Pa. 287, 1897 Pa. LEXIS 919 (Pa. 1897).
36 A. 738 (Leininger v. Summit Branch Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Davis v. Willig
56 Pa. Super. 423 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1914)