Leiner v. Lavine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Leiner v. Lavine

42 A.D.2d 781, 346 N.Y.S.2d 762, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3705

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 30, 1973

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 42 A.D.2d 781 (Leiner v. Lavine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leiner v. Lavine, 42 A.D.2d 781, 346 N.Y.S.2d 762, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3705 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, dated November 3, 1972, which, after a hearing, affirmed a determination of respondent Commissioner of the New York City Department of Social Services discontinuing petitioner’s food stamp certification as of June 30, 1972. Determination annulled, on the law, without costs, and matter remitted to the State Commissioner for a further hearing, at which the proof shall be amplified, particularly with respect to petitioner’s income. On this record there was not developed full proof of the relevant issues and of petitioner’s income. The matter should be remanded for the purpose of amplifying such proof. Munder, Acting P. J., Latham, Shapiro, Gulotta and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, dated November 3, 1972, which, after a hearing, affirmed a determination of respondent Commissioner of the New York City Department of Social Services discontinuing petitioner’s food stamp certification as of June 30, 1972. Determination annulled, on the law, without costs, and matter remitted to the State Commissioner for a further hearing, at which the proof shall be amplified, particularly with respect to petitioner’s income. On this record there was not developed full proof of the relevant issues and of petitioner’s income. The matter should be remanded for the purpose of amplifying such proof. Munder, Acting P. J., Latham, Shapiro, Gulotta and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 A.D.2d 781, 346 N.Y.S.2d 762, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3705, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leiner-v-lavine-nyappdiv-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack