Leimzider v. Hallof

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Leimzider v. Hallof

45 A.D.2d 883, 358 N.Y.S.2d 669, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4362

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 22, 1974

StatusPublished

This text of 45 A.D.2d 883 (Leimzider v. Hallof) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leimzider v. Hallof, 45 A.D.2d 883, 358 N.Y.S.2d 669, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4362 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action by vendees for specific performance of a contract to sell real property, defendant appeals from (1) a resettled judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered August 13, 1973, which, after a nonjury trial, granted plaintiffs such relief, and (2) from two orders of the same court, entered September 24, 1973 and October 31, 1973, respectively, the first denying defendant’s motion for a new trial and the second adhering to said denial of a new trial. Resettled judgment reversed, in the interests of justice, without costs, and new trial granted. Appeals from orders dismissed as moot, without costs. ' The interests of justice require the granting of a new trial, at which defendant’s committee will have an opportunity to present evidence to establish its alleged affirmative defense of defendant’s incompetence at the time the contract was made. Shapiro, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Christ, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action by vendees for specific performance of a contract to sell real property, defendant appeals from (1) a resettled judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered August 13, 1973, which, after a nonjury trial, granted plaintiffs such relief, and (2) from two orders of the same court, entered September 24, 1973 and October 31, 1973, respectively, the first denying defendant’s motion for a new trial and the second adhering to said denial of a new trial. Resettled judgment reversed, in the interests of justice, without costs, and new trial granted. Appeals from orders dismissed as moot, without costs. ' The interests of justice require the granting of a new trial, at which defendant’s committee will have an opportunity to present evidence to establish its alleged affirmative defense of defendant’s incompetence at the time the contract was made. Shapiro, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Christ, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 A.D.2d 883, 358 N.Y.S.2d 669, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leimzider-v-hallof-nyappdiv-1974.