Leiman v. 310 West 56th Street Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Leiman v. 310 West 56th Street Corp.

270 A.D.2d 211, 705 N.Y.S.2d 229, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3306

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 30, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 270 A.D.2d 211 (Leiman v. 310 West 56th Street Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leiman v. 310 West 56th Street Corp., 270 A.D.2d 211, 705 N.Y.S.2d 229, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3306 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane Solomon, J.), entered September 7, 1999, which, in a declaratory judgment action to determine plaintiff’s status as a holder of unsold shares in a residential cooperative and defendant cooperative’s right to approve the subtenancies at issue, converted a temporary restraining order to a preliminary injunction requiring, inter alia, that defendants approve a proposed sublease for apartment 7F for a period of two years, and order, same court and Justice, entered September 20, 1999, which, inter alia, directed defendant cooperative corporation to accept the Duenes tenancy forthwith, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff sufficiently demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits, irreparable injury, and a balancing of the equities in her favor to obtain the preliminary injunction here at issue (see, Doe v Axelrod, 73 NY2d 748, 750).

We have considered defendants’ remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Williams, Andrias, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane Solomon, J.), entered September 7, 1999, which, in a declaratory judgment action to determine plaintiff’s status as a holder of unsold shares in a residential cooperative and defendant cooperative’s right to approve the subtenancies at issue, converted a temporary restraining order to a preliminary injunction requiring, inter alia, that defendants approve a proposed sublease for apartment 7F for a period of two years, and order, same court and Justice, entered September 20, 1999, which, inter alia, directed defendant cooperative corporation to accept the Duenes tenancy forthwith, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff sufficiently demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits, irreparable injury, and a balancing of the equities in her favor to obtain the preliminary injunction here at issue (see, Doe v Axelrod, 73 NY2d 748, 750).

We have considered defendants’ remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Williams, Andrias, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

270 A.D.2d 211, 705 N.Y.S.2d 229, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leiman-v-310-west-56th-street-corp-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack