Leighty v. Renbarger

Indiana Court of Appeals

Leighty v. Renbarger

65 N.E.2d 637, 116 Ind. App. 620, 1946 Ind. App. LEXIS 138

Indiana Court of Appeals·Decided March 28, 1946·No. No. 17,469.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Flanagan, C. J.

Appellee has filed herein a motion to dismiss this appeal on the ground that.no question for review has been presented.

The error relied upon for reversal is the overruling of. appellants’ motion for a new trial which attempts to .challenge the sufficiency of the evidence and the legality of the decision. But appellants’ brief does not contain the pleadings, the motion for a new trial, the judgment, nor a statement of the evidence in narrative form. No question is therefore presented. Rule 2-17, Rules of Supreme Court.

Appeal dismissed.

Norn — Reported in 65 N. E. (2d) 637.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Flanagan, C. J.

Appellee has filed herein a motion to dismiss this appeal on the ground that.no question for review has been presented.

The error relied upon for reversal is the overruling of. appellants’ motion for a new trial which attempts to .challenge the sufficiency of the evidence and the legality of the decision. But appellants’ brief does not contain the pleadings, the motion for a new trial, the judgment, nor a statement of the evidence in narrative form. No question is therefore presented. Rule 2-17, Rules of Supreme Court.

Appeal dismissed.

Norn — Reported in 65 N. E. (2d) 637.

Leighty v. Renbarger, 65 N.E.2d 637, 116 Ind. App. 620, 1946 Ind. App. LEXIS 138 (Ind. Ct. App. 1946).

Pincite

65 N.E.2d 637 (Leighty v. Renbarger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related