Leighton v. One William Street Fund, Inc.

394 U.S. 988, 89 S. Ct. 1467
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedApril 21, 1969
DocketNo. 1112
StatusPublished

This text of 394 U.S. 988 (Leighton v. One William Street Fund, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Leighton v. One William Street Fund, Inc., 394 U.S. 988, 89 S. Ct. 1467 (1969).

Opinion

C. A. 2d Cir. Motion of petitioner to require certification of additional portions of appendix granted. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Marshall took .no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
394 U.S. 988, 89 S. Ct. 1467, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leighton-v-one-william-street-fund-inc-scotus-1969.