Leighton v. L.J. Lewis Enterprises, Unpublished Decision (3-27-1998)

CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 27, 1998
DocketNo. 97-P-0039.
StatusUnpublished

This text of Leighton v. L.J. Lewis Enterprises, Unpublished Decision (3-27-1998) (Leighton v. L.J. Lewis Enterprises, Unpublished Decision (3-27-1998)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Leighton v. L.J. Lewis Enterprises, Unpublished Decision (3-27-1998), (Ohio Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

Judgment Affirmed. See Opinion and Judgment Entry. [FORD] (CHRISTLEY) (O'NEILL)

PREJUDGMENT INTEREST:

When the parties agree to settle a case, an award of prejudgment interest is entirely inappropriate pursuant to the express terms of R.C. 1343.03(C) and its basic rationale.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Leighton v. L.J. Lewis Enterprises, Unpublished Decision (3-27-1998), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leighton-v-lj-lewis-enterprises-unpublished-decision-3-27-1998-ohioctapp-1998.