Leight v. W7879 LLC

New York Court of Appeals

Leight v. W7879 LLC

48 N.E.3d 960, 27 N.Y.3d 929

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 24, 2016

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 48 N.E.3d 960 (Leight v. W7879 LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leight v. W7879 LLC, 48 N.E.3d 960, 27 N.Y.3d 929 (N.Y. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, and certified question not answered upon the ground that it is unnecessary. Plaintiff John H. Masten [930]*930failed to establish that his apartment, which was deregulated in 2000 by an unchallenged order of the Division of Housing and Community Renewal, became re-regulated when he executed a renewal lease at market rate.

Concur: Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, and certified question not answered upon the ground that it is unnecessary. Plaintiff John H. Masten [930]*930failed to establish that his apartment, which was deregulated in 2000 by an unchallenged order of the Division of Housing and Community Renewal, became re-regulated when he executed a renewal lease at market rate.

Concur: Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 N.E.3d 960, 27 N.Y.3d 929, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leight-v-w7879-llc-ny-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack