Leighdon Henry v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Leighdon Henry v. State

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 30, 2017

Docket5D17-92

StatusPublished

This text of Leighdon Henry v. State (Leighdon Henry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leighdon Henry v. State, (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

LEIGHDON HENRY,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D17-92

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed November 3, 2017

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Julie H. O'Kane, Judge.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Nancy Ryan, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Leighdon Henry, Malone, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kellie A. Nielan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

We grant Leighdon Henry’s Motion for Rehearing, withdraw our earlier per curiam

affirmance and substitute the following in its place. As to Counts 1, 2, 3 and 5, the sentencing documents shall, on remand, be

amended to reflect that Henry is entitled to a review of his sentence after serving twenty

years, not twenty years after the date of his initial sentencing. See § 921.1402(2)(d), Fla.

Stat. (2014); Tyson v. State, 199 So. 3d 1087, 1089 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016).

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

PALMER, ORFINGER and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI