Leigh v. Don Bailey Carpets, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Leigh v. Don Bailey Carpets, Inc.

662 So. 2d 436, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 11668, 1995 WL 654486

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 8, 1995·No. Nos. 94-1520, 94-1508·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The undisputed facts in this consolidated appeal establish as a matter of law that neither Don Bailey Carpets, Inc. nor William D. Bailey violated any duty under section 768.125, Florida Statutes (1993) regarding the serving of alcohol to a minor. See Dowell v. Gracewood Fruit Co., 559 So.2d 217 (Fla.1990); Armstrong v. Munford, Inc., 451 So.2d 480 (Fla.1984); Sussman v. Florida East Coast Props., Inc., 557 So.2d 74 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 574 So.2d 143 (Fla.1990). Accordingly, the summary judgment under review is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The undisputed facts in this consolidated appeal establish as a matter of law that neither Don Bailey Carpets, Inc. nor William D. Bailey violated any duty under section 768.125, Florida Statutes (1993) regarding the serving of alcohol to a minor. See Dowell v. Gracewood Fruit Co., 559 So.2d 217 (Fla.1990); Armstrong v. Munford, Inc., 451 So.2d 480 (Fla.1984); Sussman v. Florida East Coast Props., Inc., 557 So.2d 74 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 574 So.2d 143 (Fla.1990). Accordingly, the summary judgment under review is affirmed.

Leigh v. Don Bailey Carpets, Inc., 662 So. 2d 436, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 11668, 1995 WL 654486 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

662 So. 2d 436 (Leigh v. Don Bailey Carpets, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related