Leigh Archer v. Happy State Bank, a Division of Centennial Bank

CourtTexas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)
DecidedJune 25, 2026
Docket11-26-00052-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Leigh Archer v. Happy State Bank, a Division of Centennial Bank (Leigh Archer v. Happy State Bank, a Division of Centennial Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Leigh Archer v. Happy State Bank, a Division of Centennial Bank, (Tex. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

Opinion filed June 25, 2026

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals ___________

No. 11-26-00052-CV ___________

CHARLIE DOMBEK AND LEIGH ARCHER, Appellants V. HAPPY STATE BANK, A DIVISION OF CENTENNIAL BANK, Appellee

On Appeal from the 17th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 017-357743-24

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellants, Charlie Dombek and Leigh Archer, filed a joint notice of appeal from the trial court’s judgment in favor of Appellee, Happy State Bank, a division of Centennial Bank. 1 The parties’ briefs have been filed. Appellant Dombek has

1 This appeal was transferred to this court from the Second Court of Appeals pursuant to a docket equalization order issued by the Texas Supreme Court. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001 (West Supp. 2025). now filed a notice of settlement and an unopposed motion for partial dismissal, stating that he and Appellee have “reached a settlement finally disposing of all claims between them relating to [the] lawsuit.” He requests that we dismiss his portion of the appeal and states that each party in that portion will bear its own expenses on appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a), (d). Appellant Archer has not filed a response opposing the relief requested in the motion. Appellants have filed an opening brief and a reply brief in this cause, which present numerous appellate issues for this court to consider. Consequently, we are of the opinion that the motion for partial dismissal should be granted. Id. R. 42.1(b). Accordingly, we grant the motion for partial dismissal, and we dismiss this appeal in part. The portion of the appeal relating to Appellant Dombek is dismissed. Appellant Archer’s appeal from the trial court’s judgment remains active.

PER CURIAM

June 25, 2026 Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Trotter, J., and Williams, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Leigh Archer v. Happy State Bank, a Division of Centennial Bank, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leigh-archer-v-happy-state-bank-a-division-of-centennial-bank-txctapp11-2026.