Leigh Ann Bass v. Eduardo Ramirez and Steve Armour

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 1, 2001
Docket13-00-00501-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Leigh Ann Bass v. Eduardo Ramirez and Steve Armour (Leigh Ann Bass v. Eduardo Ramirez and Steve Armour) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Leigh Ann Bass v. Eduardo Ramirez and Steve Armour, (Tex. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-00-501-CV


COURT OF APPEALS


THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


CORPUS CHRISTI

____________________________________________________________________

LEIGH ANN BASS

, Appellant,

v.


EDUARDO RAMIRZ AND STEVE ARMOUR

, Appellees.

____________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 329th District Court
of Wharton County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________________

O P I N I O N


Before Justices Dorsey, Rodriguez, and Castillo

Opinion Per Curiam


Appellant, LEIGH ANN BASS, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 329th District Court of Wharton County, Texas, in cause number 35272-S. The appellate record in this cause was due on December 1, 2001. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(a), notice of late record was given to the district clerk. The official responsible for preparation of the clerk's record has notified this Court that the record has not been filed because appellant has failed to make arrangements for payment of the record. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), notice was given to appellant that this appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution unless this defect was corrected within ten days from the date of this Court's notice. The date, appellant has failed to correct this defect.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant's failure to make arrangements for payment of the clerk's record, this Court's notice, and appellant's failure to correct the defect, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed

this the 1st day of February, 2001.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Leigh Ann Bass v. Eduardo Ramirez and Steve Armour, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leigh-ann-bass-v-eduardo-ramirez-and-steve-armour-texapp-2001.