Leifer v. Leifer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Leifer v. Leifer

2 A.D.2d 898, 157 N.Y.S.2d 908, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3809

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 19, 1956

StatusPublished

This text of 2 A.D.2d 898 (Leifer v. Leifer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leifer v. Leifer, 2 A.D.2d 898, 157 N.Y.S.2d 908, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3809 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

In a separation action the appeal is from an order which, inter alia, adjudges appellant in contempt of court for failure to comply with the provisions in a judgment of separation, as amended, which require him to make certain payments for the support of respondent and the issue of the marriage, and to pay a counsel fee. Order affirmed, without costs, on the authority of Altschuler v. Altschuler (246 App. Div. 779) and Dube v. Dube (230 App. Div. 494). If respondent has violated the terms of the judgment, as amended, with respect to appellant’s right of visitation, a proper remedy lies in a motion to amend the judgment with respect to the provisions requiring him to make payments for support (Altschuler v. Altschuler, supra; Dube v. Dube, supra). Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldoek, Murphy and Hallinan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a separation action the appeal is from an order which, inter alia, adjudges appellant in contempt of court for failure to comply with the provisions in a judgment of separation, as amended, which require him to make certain payments for the support of respondent and the issue of the marriage, and to pay a counsel fee. Order affirmed, without costs, on the authority of Altschuler v. Altschuler (246 App. Div. 779) and Dube v. Dube (230 App. Div. 494). If respondent has violated the terms of the judgment, as amended, with respect to appellant’s right of visitation, a proper remedy lies in a motion to amend the judgment with respect to the provisions requiring him to make payments for support (Altschuler v. Altschuler, supra; Dube v. Dube, supra). Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldoek, Murphy and Hallinan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 A.D.2d 898, 157 N.Y.S.2d 908, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3809, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leifer-v-leifer-nyappdiv-1956.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack