Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Leifer v. Leifer

Leifer v. Leifer

489 So. 2d 215, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1270, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8109
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 3, 1986
DocketNo. 85-1841
StatusPublished

This text of 489 So. 2d 215 (Leifer v. Leifer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Leifer v. Leifer, 489 So. 2d 215, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1270, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8109 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Finding that appellant failed to preserve for appellate review the issue of the applicability of the “Dead Man’s Statute” to a will contest, see Hartley v. Florida East Coast Railway, 339 So.2d 630 (Fla.1976), and finding no merit in the other issues presented, see Cripe v. Atlantic First National Bank, 422 So.2d 820 (Fla.1982); Smith v. Callison, 152 Fla. 516, 12 So.2d 381 (1943), we affirm the order denying appellant’s petition for revocation of probate and the orders taxing costs and attorney’s fees to appellant.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hartley v. Florida East Coast Railway Company
339 So. 2d 630 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1976)
Cripe v. ATLANTIC FIRST NAT. BANK, ETC.
422 So. 2d 820 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1982)
Smith v. Callison
12 So. 2d 381 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1943)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
489 So. 2d 215, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1270, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leifer-v-leifer-fladistctapp-1986.