Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Leiderman v. Leiderman

Leiderman v. Leiderman

277 A.D.2d 290, 715 N.Y.S.2d 344, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11709
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 13, 2000
StatusPublished

This text of 277 A.D.2d 290 (Leiderman v. Leiderman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Leiderman v. Leiderman, 277 A.D.2d 290, 715 N.Y.S.2d 344, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11709 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Mahon, J.), dated October 22, 1999, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court correctly concluded that there are questions of fact as to whether the plaintiff was abandoned by the defendant within the meaning of Domestic Relations Law § 170 (2). Accordingly, the motion for summary judgment was properly denied (see, Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324; see also, Schine v Schine, 31 NY2d 113; Haymes v Haymes, 221 AD2d 73). Ritter, J. P., Santucci, Krausman and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schine v. Schine
286 N.E.2d 449 (New York Court of Appeals, 1972)
Alvarez v. Prospect Hospital
501 N.E.2d 572 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
Haymes v. Haymes
221 A.D.2d 73 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
277 A.D.2d 290, 715 N.Y.S.2d 344, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11709, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leiderman-v-leiderman-nyappdiv-2000.