Leider v. State
This text of 605 So. 2d 177 (Leider v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
David Leider appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct sentence. We affirm.
Leider was convicted of solicitation to commit first degree murder. He was sentenced under guidelines “category one,” a relatively harsh offense category reserved for homicides. We agree with the holdings in Roth v. State, 601 So.2d 613 (Fla. 3d DCA June 23, 1992), Orr v. State, 597 So.2d 833 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992), and Hayles v. State, 596 So.2d 1236 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), and therefore hold that Leider’s scoresheet was correctly prepared. In so doing we certify conflict with Tarawneh v. State, 588 So.2d 1006 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
605 So. 2d 177, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 10337, 1992 WL 251410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leider-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.