Leider v. Lewis

California Supreme Court

Leider v. Lewis

368 P.3d 921, 201 Cal. Rptr. 3d 254

California Supreme Court·Decided April 27, 2016·No. No. S232622.·Published

Opinion

**921The petition for review is granted. The issues to be briefed and argued are limited to the following: (1) Does Civil Code section 3369 bar taxpayer actions brought under the authority of Code of Civil Procedure section 526a seeking to enjoin violations of Penal Code provisions concerning animal abuse?

**922(2) Does the law of the case doctrine foreclose petitioners' reliance upon that legal argument in this appeal?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

**921The petition for review is granted. The issues to be briefed and argued are limited to the following: (1) Does Civil Code section 3369 bar taxpayer actions brought under the authority of Code of Civil Procedure section 526a seeking to enjoin violations of Penal Code provisions concerning animal abuse?

**922(2) Does the law of the case doctrine foreclose petitioners' reliance upon that legal argument in this appeal?

Leider v. Lewis, 368 P.3d 921, 201 Cal. Rptr. 3d 254 (Cal. 2016).

Pincite

368 P.3d 921 (Leider v. Lewis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.