LEIDENFROST v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

LEIDENFROST v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

706 N.W.2d 56, 2005 Minn. LEXIS 754, 2005 WL 3214697

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided November 28, 2005·No. A05-1666·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed July 25, 2005, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (summary dispositions have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/Russell A. Anderson Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed July 25, 2005, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (summary dispositions have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/Russell A. Anderson Associate Justice

LEIDENFROST v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 706 N.W.2d 56, 2005 Minn. LEXIS 754, 2005 WL 3214697 (Mich. 2005).

Pincite

706 N.W.2d 56 (LEIDENFROST v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related