Leidel v. Annicelli

20 N.E.3d 644, 24 N.Y.3d 976, 995 N.Y.S.2d 699, 2014 NY Slip Op 86595, 2014 N.Y. LEXIS 2834
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 16, 2014
StatusPublished

This text of 20 N.E.3d 644 (Leidel v. Annicelli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Leidel v. Annicelli, 20 N.E.3d 644, 24 N.Y.3d 976, 995 N.Y.S.2d 699, 2014 NY Slip Op 86595, 2014 N.Y. LEXIS 2834 (N.Y. 2014).

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the Appellate Division order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution and the stipulation does not qualify as a final judgment within the meaning of CPLR 5602 (a) (1) (ii) to bring up for review the prior nonfinal Appellate Division order because it was entered into without prejudice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 N.E.3d 644, 24 N.Y.3d 976, 995 N.Y.S.2d 699, 2014 NY Slip Op 86595, 2014 N.Y. LEXIS 2834, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leidel-v-annicelli-ny-2014.