Leibow v. Tilson

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Leibow v. Tilson

124 Misc. 743, 209 N.Y.S. 224, 1925 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 744

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedApril 9, 1925

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 124 Misc. 743 (Leibow v. Tilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leibow v. Tilson, 124 Misc. 743, 209 N.Y.S. 224, 1925 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 744 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The plaintiff having been constituted an exclusive agent and his agency not having been revoked, “ the principal cannot make a sale himself without becoming liable for the commissions.” (Slattery v. Cothran, 210 App. Div. 581.) No misrepresentation made by the purchaser could have any effect on the plaintiff’s rights.

Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.

All concur; present, Bijur, Mitchell and Proskauer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The plaintiff having been constituted an exclusive agent and his agency not having been revoked, “ the principal cannot make a sale himself without becoming liable for the commissions.” (Slattery v. Cothran, 210 App. Div. 581.) No misrepresentation made by the purchaser could have any effect on the plaintiff’s rights.

Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.

All concur; present, Bijur, Mitchell and Proskauer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

124 Misc. 743, 209 N.Y.S. 224, 1925 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 744, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leibow-v-tilson-nyappterm-1925.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack