Leibow v. Tilson
124 Misc. 743, 209 N.Y.S. 224, 1925 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 744
Opinion
The plaintiff having been constituted an exclusive agent and his agency not having been revoked, “ the principal cannot make a sale himself without becoming liable for the commissions.” (Slattery v. Cothran, 210 App. Div. 581.) No misrepresentation made by the purchaser could have any effect on the plaintiff’s rights.
Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.
All concur; present, Bijur, Mitchell and Proskauer, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Leibow v. Tilson, 124 Misc. 743, 209 N.Y.S. 224, 1925 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 744 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1925).
124 Misc. 743 (Leibow v. Tilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Duross Co. v. Jannelli
136 Misc. 193 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1930)