Leibert v. New York State Office of Children & Family Services
82 A.D.3d 655, 919 N.Y.2d 332
Opinion
[656] The record contains substantial evidence that supports the determination that the children’s best interests would be served by their removal from petitioner’s home (see Matter of O’Rourke v Kirby, 54 NY2d 8, 16 [1981]). The evidence also supports the finding that petitioner failed to provide one of the boys with his prescribed medication (see Matter of Joshua Noel A., 40 AD3d 749 [2007]). Concur — Tom, J.P, Sweeney, Catterson, Acosta and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Leibert v. New York State Office of Children & Family Services, 82 A.D.3d 655, 919 N.Y.2d 332 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).
82 A.D.3d 655 (Leibert v. New York State Office of Children & Family Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
O'Rourke v. Kirby
429 N.E.2d 85 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
In re Noel A.
40 A.D.3d 749 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)