Lei Ke v. Drexel Univ.

Supreme Court

Lei Ke v. Drexel Univ.

140 S. Ct. 2555, 206 L. Ed. 2d 459

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMarch 23, 2020

DocketNo. 19-6991.

StatusPublished

This text of 140 S. Ct. 2555 (Lei Ke v. Drexel Univ.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lei Ke v. Drexel Univ., 140 S. Ct. 2555, 206 L. Ed. 2d 459 (U.S. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Office dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals , 506 U.S. 1 (1992) (per curiam ).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Office dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals , 506 U.S. 1 (1992) (per curiam ).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

140 S. Ct. 2555, 206 L. Ed. 2d 459, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lei-ke-v-drexel-univ-scotus-2020.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack