Lehrman & Rosenwald, Inc. v. Siegel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lehrman & Rosenwald, Inc. v. Siegel

232 A.D. 824

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 232 A.D. 824 (Lehrman & Rosenwald, Inc. v. Siegel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lehrman & Rosenwald, Inc. v. Siegel, 232 A.D. 824 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Order granting defendants’ motion to dismiss complaint pursuant to rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice, and section 476 of the Civil Practice [825]*825Act, reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. In our opinion the complaint states a cause of action in fraud for the damages suffered by plaintiff by reason thereof. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order granting defendants’ motion to dismiss complaint pursuant to rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice, and section 476 of the Civil Practice [825]*825Act, reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. In our opinion the complaint states a cause of action in fraud for the damages suffered by plaintiff by reason thereof. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

232 A.D. 824, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lehrman-rosenwald-inc-v-siegel-nyappdiv-1931.