Lehr v. Satsky
124 A. 67, 99 N.J.L. 512, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 176
This text of 124 A. 67 (Lehr v. Satsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Lehr v. Satsky, 124 A. 67, 99 N.J.L. 512, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 176 (N.J. 1924).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should bo affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chibe Justice, Trenchard, Mintuen, Kalisch, Campbell, Heppenheimer, Gardner, Yan Buskirk, Clare, J'J. 10.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Lanza v. DiFronzo
56 Ohio Law. Abs. 310 (Cuyahoga County Probate Court, 1949)
Sedgwick v. National Savings & Trust Co.
130 F.2d 440 (D.C. Circuit, 1942)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
124 A. 67, 99 N.J.L. 512, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lehr-v-satsky-nj-1924.