Lehr v. Satsky

124 A. 67, 99 N.J.L. 512, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 176

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 3, 1924·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should bo affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chibe Justice, Trenchard, Mintuen, Kalisch, Campbell, Heppenheimer, Gardner, Yan Buskirk, Clare, J'J. 10.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lehr v. Satsky, 124 A. 67, 99 N.J.L. 512, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 176 (N.J. 1924).

Pincite

124 A. 67 (Lehr v. Satsky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.