Lehr v. Feigenbaum

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Lehr v. Feigenbaum

191 Misc. 349, 80 N.Y.S.2d 754, 1948 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2649

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedMarch 24, 1948

StatusPublished

This text of 191 Misc. 349 (Lehr v. Feigenbaum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lehr v. Feigenbaum, 191 Misc. 349, 80 N.Y.S.2d 754, 1948 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2649 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The landlords as tenants in common were

entitled to maintain this proceeding. (Lipschitz v. Sindell, 190 Misc. 1062; Slade v. Hornick Co., 189 Misc. 104.) The verdict was rendered in accordance with the trial court’s instructions under which the case was properly submitted to the jury, and the landlords were, therefore, entitled to a final order in their favor.

The final order setting aside verdict and dismissing landlords’ petition should be unanimously reversed upon the law, with $30 costs of this appeal to landlords, verdict of the jury reinstated, and final order directed in favor of landlords.

MacCrate, Steinbrink and Rubenstein, JJ., concur.

Final order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI