Lehr v. Feigenbaum

191 Misc. 349, 80 N.Y.S.2d 754, 1948 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2649
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided March 24, 1948·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The landlords as tenants in common were

entitled to maintain this proceeding. (Lipschitz v. Sindell, 190 Misc. 1062; Slade v. Hornick Co., 189 Misc. 104.) The verdict was rendered in accordance with the trial court’s instructions under which the case was properly submitted to the jury, and the landlords were, therefore, entitled to a final order in their favor.

The final order setting aside verdict and dismissing landlords’ petition should be unanimously reversed upon the law, with $30 costs of this appeal to landlords, verdict of the jury reinstated, and final order directed in favor of landlords.

MacCrate, Steinbrink and Rubenstein, JJ., concur.

Final order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lehr v. Feigenbaum, 191 Misc. 349, 80 N.Y.S.2d 754, 1948 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2649 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1948).

191 Misc. 349 (Lehr v. Feigenbaum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Slade v. Louis Hornick Co.
189 Misc. 104 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1947)
Lipschitz v. Sindell
190 Misc. 1062 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1947)