Lehmer v. People ex rel. Miller

80 Ill. 601
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1875
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 80 Ill. 601 (Lehmer v. People ex rel. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lehmer v. People ex rel. Miller, 80 Ill. 601 (Ill. 1875).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Breese

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This is an appeal from a judgment of the county court of Cook county, rendered for a special assessment levied and assessed upon certain lands and lots in the town of Lake, for the improvement of Parker’s avenue, so called, and reported by the collector to be delinquent.

Several objections were made on the application for judgment, none of which do we deem valid.

As to all matters preceding the application for judgment, they must, under the authority of The People v. Brislin, ante, p. 423, be considered res adjudicata, and not now to be again investigated.

As to the point made on the judgment, that the law authorizes but one judgment for taxes and special assessments, we fail to see in these proceedings any substantial departure from the provisions of the General ¡Revenue Law, not provided' for by the “ Act in relation to the collection of taxes and special assessments,” in force May 2, 1873. Sess. Laws 1873, p. 69. See, also, The People, etc. v. Brislin, supra.

There is nothing in the point as to amendments of the assessment rolls. These were clearly clerical errors and omissions not affecting appellant’s rights or interests in any manner.

It is too late now to inquire into the nature of Parker’s avenue—whether public or private. That objection should have been made when application for confirmation of the assessment was made, of which appellant had notice by publication. It is now res adjudieata. It must have been adjudged a public street when the order of confirmation was entered, and there is no appeal from that.

We fail to perceive any error in the judgment, and it must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Doherty v. City of Detroit
222 N.W. 177 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1928)
In re Stutsman County
88 F. 337 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Dakota, 1898)
People ex rel. Kochersperger v. Sass
49 N.E. 501 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1898)
Doremus v. People ex rel. Kochersperger
43 N.E. 701 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1896)
Scotten v. City of Detroit
64 N.W. 579 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1895)
Riebling v. People ex rel. Columbia Levee & Drainage District
33 N.E. 1090 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1893)
Scott v. People ex rel. Douglas
33 N.E. 180 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1892)
Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. People ex rel. Seip
11 N.E. 418 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1887)
Gage v. Parker
103 Ill. 528 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1882)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
80 Ill. 601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lehmer-v-people-ex-rel-miller-ill-1875.